Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Don't Skype Naked

As I tend to rapidly lose faith in humanity a little more each day, here is a story that just drained me of any of the hope that I had left.  And lemme tell you, it wasn't a lot to begin with, but it's really saying something that it can all be zapped at once. 

What we have here is a man who is either one of two things.  He's either a genius or he has an unbelievable talent for finding the dumbest women out there in droves.  I don't understand these stories when they involve just a couple of women, but when they involve over 350 different women, then I'm completely confused. 

The man I'm talking about is named Karen "Gary" Kazaryan.  (OK, first of all, who names their male child Karen?  Maybe I should give the guy a break with a horrible name like that.)  And according to USAToday, he allegedly "...hacked into hundreds of social media and email accounts to coerce more than 350 women into showing him their naked bodies."  Wait. What now?  How many?? 

But wait!  There's more!  Here was his "ingenious" scheme that netted him 350 naked women:  He would hack hack into the women's social media accounts and then search their Facebook messages, emails and other files for nude or semi-nude pictures of them.  Who are these women who are keeping nude photos of themselves on Facebook??  That doesn't seem like the most appropriate place for nude photos of yourself, but that's just me.  But here's where it starts to get weird:  "He then posed as a friend, persuading them to strip while he watched via Skype, captured images of them, or both."  Dafuq?

You are dry shaving me that that worked.  Can someone explain to me how he managed to Skype with them without them realizing that he was not their friend?  Did he just cover up his webcam and say that his didn't work?  Did he sound just like whoever their friend was?  Because that seems like it would be key to this whole thing working.   Do this many women really make it a habit to get naked on Skype?  Am I the only one who thinks that this sounds like a bad idea from the beginning?  Friend or not, if you're Skyping with someone, they can take a screen shot of anything.  These people never considered that before getting undressed in front of a camera?  Apparently not.

The article goes on to say that "When the women discovered that Kazaryan was posing as a friend, he often blackmailed them with the nude photos he had fraudulently obtained to coerce more stripping, prosecutors said. In some cases, he's accused of posting the nude photos to the victims' Facebook pages."  See, now I have several more questions.  These dopes who were tricked into this in the first place, you're telling me that they eventually figured out what was going on?  I find that difficult to believe.  Oh, but if only they could have put those sleuthing skills to better use before disrobing for a total stranger on Skype.  And as far as the blackmailing, what say you just delete your Facebook account and not get naked again?  That seems like a better solution to me. Then again, I'm not taking off my clothes for someone who says that they're my friend on the Internet.  Sorry. 

It's the sheer number of women that fell for this that astonishes me.  350.  That's like one moron a day for almost an entire year (if you took two weeks of for Christmas break or something).  I'm really conflicted as to how much trouble this guy should be in.  On the one hand, he's obviously perverted.  But on the other hand, he wouldn't have been able to do any of this without an awful lot of help from each one of those morons.  Ok, the blackmail part is pretty bad and he should definitely get in trouble for that.  But the other stuff?  Eh. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Monday, January 28, 2013

Nice Guns, Nancy

I ran across this picture today.  It's Ronald Reagan asking Frank Sinatra to stop dancing with Nancy Reagan.  Behold! 




Jesus, Nancy!  How 'bout them arms you got going on there?!  So it was "Say no to drugs", but "Say yes to guns"?  She's like the original Michelle Obama!  I mean, everyone talks about Michelle's arms, but 1980s Nancy Reagan looks like she could kick Michelle's ass in an arm wrestling competition.   Did Nancy spend her White House time working out her entire body? Or did she just focus on the top half and let the trickle-down theory take care of the rest.  (Good God.  I just made a joke about economic policy from the 1980s.  I don't know whether I should be proud of myself or ashamed.  I'm leaning toward ashamed.) 

And what is with Frank Sinatra's oh-so obvious toupee??  That thing is awful!  It's like a helmet.  A really bad helmet. I've never understood why celebrities who have a lot of money can end up looking so incredibly cheap.  Like the ones who get horrible plastic surgery.  Did you go to some cut rate surgeon?  You have gazillions of dollars.  Why do you look like a clown? Same thing with the toupee.  Come on, Frank.  Spring for something a little more flattering.  Spring for a hat.  Anything is better than that, really.

That's all I have for today.  Thirty year old photos and equally old commentary.  

Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Dumb As A Stick

Kind of a slow news day today.  That's a good thing.  So here's a video of a dog who can't quite figure out how to get his stick through a gate.  He's so dumb that it's truly adorable.  And I love how he prances about at the end.  You know that in his head he's all "I did it!  I did it all by myself!"  (Either that or in his head he's just all "Woof...woof...stick...woof...woof.")  Behold! 

Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, January 24, 2013

And So, What's Wrong With Her?

So get this.  We hear these stories from time to time.  A 15-year old kid kills his entire family.  It's gruesome and disgusting.  Do I need to go into more detail?  I don't think that I do.  It's pretty much just what it sounds like.  And of course, right now there are plenty of people all a-clammoring over what his motivation was.  (That is interspersed with other family members insisting that he was a "good kid".  Yeah, no he wasn't.  I'm going to base this solely on the fact that he gunned down both of his parents and three siblings (as if I'd have anything else to base it on), but that alone constitutes him not being a good kid.  Just saying.)  But I'd like to take a moment to look at another aspect of this story that, for some reason, seems to be getting no attention. 

According to the article over at the Huffington Post, the kid (who I am not going to name for the same reasons that I don't name any of the lunatics that do the mass shootings) apparently took a picture of his dead mother (dead because he had just killed her) and texted it to his girlfriend.  As if that isn't crazy enough, he then went over to the girlfriend's house and spent the day with her and her mother.  Wait a minute.  What now? 

While it is one sort of crazy to gun down your entire family when you are 15, it is an entirely different sort of crazy to be a teenager (or around that age) and have someone text you a picture of their dead mother and you don't do anything about it and instead choose to spend the entire day with that person and not mention to, say, your mother that the kid that's hanging around with them just killed at least one person!  What kind of a person is this girl?!  Good Lord.  How is that even possible?  I can't say for sure what my reaction would be if someone I really liked texted me a picture of their dead mother, but I am fairly certain that it would not include doing nothing!  How does one do nothing and just go about the day like it's no big deal?!  

I don't know that the girl needs to be necessarily charged with a bunch of stuff, but I'm thinking that something is probably appropriate.  You kinda gotta know that if someone texts you a picture of a dead person, you need to say something to someone lest you face some sort of a consequence.  It's odd how people pick and choose what parts of what story they want to focus on.  This is a huge thing in my mind, but I don't see it much in the reports about this incident, so I guess I'm the only one.  What a surprise. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

 Remember the cool little video that was nominated for an Oscar which depicted the making of guacamole out of inanimate objects?  Yeah, here's another one by the same people, only this time they're making spaghetti.  It's not as good as the guacamole one, but it's still pretty awesome.  And since I'm having one hell of a time writing things right now, it's going to have to do.  Behold! 

Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Monday, January 21, 2013

Lie Witness News - Inauguration Edition

The inauguration was today.  Of course, that didn't stop Jimmy Kimmel from asking people about it on Friday.  It also didn't stop people from commenting on ridiculous and made up details that were presented to them about the inauguration that hadn't happened yet.  Lie Witness News is what Kimmel calls this segment. He's onto something.  I'm not sure what, but something. 



Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Congratulations!

My beloved SF 49ers are back in the Super Bowl after an eighteen year absence and after a whole lot of crappy football. I'm very excited. I am a little concerned that our coach, Jim Harbaugh, might have a heart attack before the big game is over if things don't go his way. Below is a clip of what will go down in history as a classic meltdown. It will also give psychiatrists something to study in the likely event that he is one day committed.

Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Fetch!

I don't know what my deal is.  I don't know if it's just writer's block or if I'm burnt out or if there really isn't anything overly compelling to mock in the news these days.  I don't get it.  But whatever it is, it's real and it's here.  So in lieu of nothing, here's a dog with a GoPro strapped to it. 


Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Friday, January 18, 2013

He Finally Admitted It

Lance Armstrong had a little sit down with Oprah and finally admitted that he doped in all seven of his Tour de France wins.  It was a welcome admission considering what a prick he has been about denying everything up until this point.  Seriously, he has been so freaking adamant about not cheating this entire time that it almost wasn't enough that he just simply answered "Yes" when asked if he had cheated.  I can't really explain it any more than that, but if you've seen him previously deny everything, you might understand what I'm talking about.  Below is a compilation of him being an arrogant a-hole time and time and time again.  Maybe that will help. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Whose Guns? All Your Guns

With all of the talk about gun control and whose guns are going to get taken away and if the Second Amendment is getting trampled on, I think it's time for a little Jimmy Kimmel to lighten the load just a bit.  Here is a silly little commercial that he came up with.  I find it particularly amusing due to the context that it ends up being in.  Because if there is one thing that folks love to do with issues like guns, it's ignore context.  Behold! 


Stumble Upon Toolbar Sphere: Related Content